This week Chris and I participated in the RIPE 78 meeting in Reykjavík. Being part of the group was fun as always and we had quite some interesting conversations with peers from (not only) the IPv6 community.
Big thanks to the RIPE NCC team for the smooth organization and for taking care of us!
In this post I’ll provide some notes on talks I found particularly interesting, plus links to our own contributions.
Continue readingWe are glad to announce the Windows Insight repository. The content of this repository aims to assist efforts on analysing inner working principles, functionalities, and properties of the Microsoft Windows operating system. This repository stores relevant documentation as well as executable files needed for conducting analysis studies.
Some of the content of this repository has been created in the course of a project named ‘Studie zu Systemaufbau, Protokollierung, Härtung und Sicherheitsfunktionen in Windows 10 (SiSyPHuS Win10)’ (ger.) – ‘Study of system design, logging, hardening, and security functions in Windows 10’ (eng.). This project has been contracted by the German Federal Office for Information Security (ger., Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik – BSI). The work planned as part of the project is conducted by ERNW GmbH, starting in May 2017.
Continue readingChris and I will give a tutorial on the above topic at next week’s RIPE Meeting in Reykjavík. In this post (actually this will probably become a small series of posts) I’ll try to summarize some thoughts on IPv6 security in enterprise environments in 2019.
We’re going to cover three main areas:
Let’s start with the first item. In real-life scenarios the security of “a protocol” – IPv6 can rather be considered a “protocol family” which includes helper protocols like ICMPv6 and MLD (which in turn is implemented by means of ICMPv6 messages) and potentially others like DHCPv6 – might depend on a number of factors:
Continue readingDominik Phillips and I are taking part in a tour organized by Heise Security – the Heise Security Tour. We give a talk titled “PowerShell: Attack under the radar”. In this talk, we provide an overview of the architecture of PowerShell and show how attackers may use PowerShell for malicious purposes. We demonstrate PowerShell post-exploitation activities implemented as part of publicly available frameworks, such as Empire. We also discuss a security concept for defending against such activities.
Continue readingYesterday, Cisco released a number of security advisories. Three of the advisories originated from research performed by us for the Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Fabric Switches / Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI).
More specifically, these advisories are the following:
Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Fabric Switches Application Centric Infrastructure Mode Default SSH Key Vulnerability
https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20190501-nexus9k-sshkey
CVSS Base Score: 9.8
Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Fabric Switches Application Centric Infrastructure Mode Root Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20190501-nexus9k-rpe
CVSS Base Score: 7.8
When you are working in the area of mobile security, you sooner or later receive requests from clients asking you to test specific ‘Mobile Device Management’ (MDM) solutions which they (plan to) use, the corresponding mobile apps, as well as different environment setups and device policy sets.
The expectations are often high, not only for the MDM solutions ability to massively reduce the administrative workload of keeping track, updating and managing the often hundreds or thousands of devices within a company but also regarding the improvements towards the level of security that an MDM solution is regularly advertised to provide.
We’re regularly asked to review IPv6 address plans from different organizations and I’d like to share some reflections from such a process currently happening. I’ve discussed a few aspects of IPv6 address planning before; those readers interested please see this post which contains some references.
The organization in question is headquartered in Germany, has ~60K employees and a number of subsidiaries in European countries. They belong to a “traditional industry sector” (so they’re not an “Internet company”, even though they – as the majority of large organizations right now – strive to be one in a few years ;-).
Continue readingStarting a post, in 2019, with a mention of sth being “IPv4-only” somewhat hurts ;-), but here we go. Recently Manel Rodero from Barcelona asked me the following question on Twitter:
In this post I’ll try to discuss some inherent aspects of that question and ofc I’ll try to provide a response to it, too ;-).
Let’s first think about the main IPv6-related risks (= threats put into a context of relevance) in an “environment [that] is only IPv4”. While some of you might scratch your heads “what IPv6 threats could there be in an IPv4 setting?” I’m tempted to scratch my head: “what could be the reasons to run an university network without IPv6 these days, or to use BIND?” (which I have a strong opinion on, see here or here). But I disgress. More seriously the main reason for the question can be broken down to:
Continue readingSome years ago Christopher wrote two posts (2016, 2015) about the IPv6-related characteristics of the WiFi network at Cisco Live Europe. To somewhat continue this tradition and for mere technical interest I had a look at some properties of this year’s setting.
There were two SSIDs of interest: a dual-stacked one (“CiscoLive2019”) and one with v6-only plus NAT64 (“CL-NAT64”). For some background on the underlying infrastructure components you might look at this thread by Nicolas Darchis from the NOC or at this tweet from Dominik Pickhardt. Some stats on IPv6 usage at CLEUR can be found here.
Continue readingAt first a very happy new year to everybody!
While thinking about the agenda of the upcoming Troopers NGI IPv6 Track I realized that quite a lot of IPv6-related topics have been covered in the last years by various IPv6 practitioners (like my colleague Christopher Werny) or researchers (like my friend Antonios Atlasis). In a kind of shameless self plug I then decided to put together of list of IPv6 talks I myself gave at several occasions and of publications I (co-) authored. Please find this list below (sorted by years); you can click on the titles to access the respective documents/sources.
I hope some of this can be of help for one or the other among you in the course of your own IPv6 efforts.
Cheers,