<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>RouterOS on Insinuator.net - Bold Statements</title>
    <link>https://insinuator.net/tags/routeros/</link>
    <description>Recent content in RouterOS on Insinuator.net - Bold Statements</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://insinuator.net/tags/routeros/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Implementing an Obsolete VPN Protocol on Top of HTTP: Because Why Not?</title>
      <link>https://insinuator.net/2016/05/implementing-an-obsolete-vpn-protocol-on-top-of-http-because-why-not/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://insinuator.net/2016/05/implementing-an-obsolete-vpn-protocol-on-top-of-http-because-why-not/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Recently I’ve started some research on MikroTik’s RouterOS, the operating system that ships with RouterBOARD devices. As I’m running such a device myself, one day I got curious about security vulnerabilities that have been reported on the operating system and the running services as it comes with tons of &lt;a href=&#34;http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:RouterOS_features&#34;&gt;features&lt;/a&gt;. Searching for known vulnerabilities in RouterOS on Google doesn’t really yield a lot of recent security related stuff. So I thought, there is either a lack of (public) research or maybe it is super secure… 🙂&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
