<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>R2 on Insinuator.net - Bold Statements</title>
    <link>https://insinuator.net/tags/r2/</link>
    <description>Recent content in R2 on Insinuator.net - Bold Statements</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://insinuator.net/tags/r2/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Windows Server 2008 R2 BSI-compliance</title>
      <link>https://insinuator.net/2012/07/windows-server-2008-r2-bsi-compliance/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://insinuator.net/2012/07/windows-server-2008-r2-bsi-compliance/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Recommendations by the &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.bsi.bund.de/EN/Home/home_node.html&#34;&gt;German Federal Office for Information Security&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;em&gt;BSI – Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik&lt;/em&gt;) are obligatory for German government agencies, civil services and authorities (like recommendations of the NIST are relevant to American government agencies and authorities). They are often used as references and security best practices in other countries as well. Hence it is hard to understand why the recommendations on how to harden Windows Server &lt;strong&gt;2008&lt;/strong&gt; based systems were published only some weeks ago and only on a preliminary draft basis (which is, obviously, better than nothing ;-)).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
