<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Patching on Insinuator.net - Bold Statements</title>
    <link>https://insinuator.net/tags/patching/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Patching on Insinuator.net - Bold Statements</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://insinuator.net/tags/patching/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Once more: hardening is better than patching</title>
      <link>https://insinuator.net/2011/04/once-more-hardening-is-better-than-patching/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://insinuator.net/2011/04/once-more-hardening-is-better-than-patching/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I can’t help myself. And I fully understand that some of you, dear readers, might get a bit annoyed by always hearing the same tune from our side. This post is, surprise!, about yesterday’s Microsoft Patch Tuesday which – as can be seen &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms11-apr.mspx&#34;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&#34;http://blogs.technet.com/b/srd/archive/2011/04/12/assessing-the-risk-of-the-april-security-updates.aspx%20&#34;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; – disclosed quite a number of vulnerabilities in various Microsoft components. To make the point evoked in this post’s title I’d like to draw your attention to two particular bulletins, both rated as critical.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
