<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Legal on Insinuator.net - Bold Statements</title>
    <link>https://insinuator.net/tags/legal/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Legal on Insinuator.net - Bold Statements</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://insinuator.net/tags/legal/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>3 Ways for 3-Letter-Agencies to get your Government Proof, Indecipherable Cloud Text Messages</title>
      <link>https://insinuator.net/2013/04/3-ways-for-3-letter-agencies-to-get-your-government-proof-indecipherable-cloud-text-messages/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://insinuator.net/2013/04/3-ways-for-3-letter-agencies-to-get-your-government-proof-indecipherable-cloud-text-messages/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=&#34;http://gritsforbreakfast.blogspot.de/2013/04/encryption-for-cloud-communications-may.html&#34;&gt;gritsforbreakfast blog post&lt;/a&gt; making the rounds on the &lt;a href=&#34;https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/liberationtech/2013-April/008100.html&#34;&gt;Liberation Tech mailing list&lt;/a&gt; about security of Apple’s iMessaging service is gaining quite some attention. The post refers to a &lt;a href=&#34;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57577887-38/apples-imessage-encryption-trips-up-feds-surveillance/&#34;&gt;CNET article&lt;/a&gt; on how the iMessage service “stymied attempts by federal drug enforcement agents to eavesdrop” conversations due its end-to-end encryption and commends Apple for protecting the user’s privacy while pointing out that Gmail and Facebook Messaging don’t. However, I disagree on some points of the blog post and therefore want to discuss them here.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cloud needn’t be daunting | Guide to legal aspects for non-legals</title>
      <link>https://insinuator.net/2010/12/cloud-neednt-be-daunting-guide-to-legal-aspects-for-non-legals/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://insinuator.net/2010/12/cloud-neednt-be-daunting-guide-to-legal-aspects-for-non-legals/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The British Standards Institution recently published “Cloud Computing. A Practical Introduction to the Legal Issues”. I ordered an electronic copy yesterday (I did that &lt;a href=&#34;http://shop.bsigroup.com/en/ProductDetail/?pid=000000000030215581&#34;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, for GBP 30) and after a first glance can say there’s lots of valuable information in it.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Merry christmas to everybody, have some peaceful and relaxing days&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Enno&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
