<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ESX on Insinuator.net - Bold Statements</title>
    <link>https://insinuator.net/tags/esx/</link>
    <description>Recent content in ESX on Insinuator.net - Bold Statements</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://insinuator.net/tags/esx/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Some reflections on virtualization security, part 1</title>
      <link>https://insinuator.net/2009/12/some-reflections-on-virtualization-security-part-1/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://insinuator.net/2009/12/some-reflections-on-virtualization-security-part-1/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Today was an interesting day, for a number of reasons. Amongst those it stuck out that we were approached by two very large environments (both &amp;gt; 50K employees) to provide security review/advise, as they want to “virtualize their DMZs, by means of VMware ESX”.&lt;br&gt;&#xA;[yes, more correctly I could/should have written: “virtualize some of their DMZ segments”. but this essentially means: “mostly all of their DMZs” in 6-12 months. and “their DMZ backend systems together with some internal servers” in 12-24 months. and “all of this” in 24-36 months. so it’s the same discussion anyway, just on a shifted timescale ;-)]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
